If You Can’t Publish Racist Law Review Articles, What’s Even The Point Of Law School?
Law professors throw epic fit after law review editors propose 'edits.'
Law professors throw epic fit after law review editors propose 'edits.'
It's a logical fallacy issue-spotter!
Adoption of Chrometa represents more than a technological upgrade; it reflects a professional philosophy that values accuracy, transparency, and efficiency.
Amy Wax finally took her racially insulting behavior far enough that the school had to step in.
And have *never* graduated in the top quarter as far as she can remember.
One story loomed over 2017 for Penn Law. But you wouldn't know it from the dean's letter.
At least it's an ethos.
* Federal law enforcement's crackdown on NCAA coaches has likely brought an end to Rick Pitino's career. That said, we thought his career was over when we all learned that Louisville hired hookers for recruits so maybe he still has a shot. [ESPN] * Law firm mergers continue at a record place. Yep, there's no fundamental market weakness here at all. [Am Law Daily] * DOJ lawyers face an unpleasant grilling at the Second Circuit. Maybe someday Sessions can disinvite judges he doesn't want criticizing his unsupported legal theories. [Slate] * Women losing pregnancies while detained by the administration. I'd say we're going to look back on this era of immigration policy in horror, but we can probably go ahead and be horrified now. [Huffington Post] * The USD Alumni Board has weighed in on the Wax/Alexander op-ed. They take a "let's all come together" approach, which isn't wrong as much as it seems asymmetric. When one-side throws bombs about cultural superiority, decrying divisiveness puts the onus on the wrong side side to move. [Motions Online] * The most likely grants from the long conference. [Empirical SCOTUS] * Here's how you get $4 billion in punitive damages (hint: be in Texas). [Law.com]
Penn Law alumni speak up about stamping out bias.
Law professor says critics can't "read, analyze, and act."
What, exactly, were these law professors really trying to say? LawProfBlawg has an idea...
Lex Machina harnesses generative AI capabilities to revolutionize the way legal professionals interact with data to improve bottom line for their business.
When two law professors wrote a dog whistle of an editorial, students stood up. And the students deserve everyone's support.
Ripping racist op-ed isn't disrespectful, it's necessary.
Professors think things were better when women and minorities just acted more like white guys.